Why We Can to Some Degree Sympathize With Bonnie and Clyde

It’s obvious: we see a certain infamy and maybe even some adoration for some of the greatest stories of our time, and a lot of those stories involve characters with less-than-stellar moralities. Case in point: these infamous thieves we’ve all heard of. We’ve got the likes of Robin Hood, and even Long John Silver. We sometimes revere these characters, yet they were thieves. Sometimes cold-blooded, in fact. And then we have the likes of the notorious Bonnie and Clyde…. We can safely say this duo just might blow the likes out of any fiction out of the water for one obvious reason —

Yes, Bonnie and Clyde Did Exist in Real Life — and They Robbed a Lot of People — and Even Committed MurderBonnie and Clyde identity theft

So, without a doubt, Bonnie and Clyde were not to be adored or admired in any way. However…. (and that’s a big however), we can understand the signs of the times and realize that what can drive a person to steal often revolves around the way of life, the hardships, the turmoil, and the trouble of a victimized society scrambling for the scraps at any table.

Bonnie and Clyde basically tried to survive. In any way they knew how. In fact, historical accounts actually show that Bonnie herself was more or less the simpleton standing behind Clyde while he did the stealing, shooting, and killing! They were nomads. They were an American Bohemia of “throwing caution to the wind” and loving love, a masterful open-road eternity of duality selfishness that was, in and of itself, endearing.

In a nutshell — Bonnie and Clyde were hopelessly, recklessly, and adoringly in love with each other and their lives together. They were a tragic love story, and that’s what drew us in.

We Can Say for Certain, Though, That in This Day and Age of Identity Theft, Bonnie and Clyde Would Have No Chance

It’s all relative, really. Crime has changed over the generations. That’s why it’s so easy to look back on the legends of old — our John Dillingers, Meyer Lanskys, and Al Capones of our age — and see them for their notoriety. Crime todayidentity theft, credit and bank fraud, mass murder, genocide — rings truer than anything Bonnie and Clyde ever did.

In the end, Bonnie and Clyde are two people who were so in love that they were willing to steal and kill for each other.

Why Robin Hood Won’t Ever Commit Identity Theft

Here’s a profile on Robin of Locksley, also known as “Robin of the Hood” (or just Robin Hood) — the guy was a wealthy son of a lord sent to Jerusalem to fight for King Richard and then was captured by the denizens there only to escape and sail his way back to the mainland of England countless years later. The welcome party, though, wasn’t what he had expected when he found out that his home, along with his father, had been eradicated with nothing left to show for it, leaving nothing for Robin to call a home. So what does he do?

He Survives. This Is Why Identity Theft Isn’t Robin Hood!

Sure, he became a thief among many infamous thieves in history and literature. The Prince ofidentity theft robin hood Thieves, actually, living in Sherwood Forest without a home. Without blood relatives. His entire history was annihilated from existence by the Sheriff of Nottingham. Robin became a ruthless outlaw stricken with vengeance over the death of his father, conversing with a bunch of “merry men” like Little John, Friar Tuck, and Will Scarlet, pretty much in the same boat he’s in! But he most definitely is not a criminal committing identity theft.

The reason why is due to the man’s insistence to rob the rich and feed the poor. His investment is on the poor. Not himself. A criminal committing identity theft only cares about himself/herself and nobody else. Period.

We’re Pretty Sure Robin Hood Would, in Fact, Approve of Identity Theft Protection

After all, the Sheriff of Nottingham practically stole King Richard’s identity by usurping his authority and trying to run England all on his own! Even if you were to look at other variations of this story about Robin Hood, we could point the finger even more squarely on the snide Prince John (not “Little” John, that guy’s cool) for trying to even wear the king’s crown.

In a nutshell, we can say Robin Hood is identity theft protection!